PI5 — Target Acquisition Satellite (Level 5: Judgement & Responsibility)

Mission Goal

Design and justify a “target acquisition” system that detects a defined target using sensors (typically vision) and produces trustworthy evidence and decision logic. You must address ambiguity, false positives, and ethics.

Why This Matters

Targeting systems are high-responsibility engineering. Even in a classroom-safe version (objects only), the professional skill is the same: define targets, quantify uncertainty, prove performance, and set ethical boundaries.

What Data You Collect

Hardware / Software Needed

Inputs From Other Teams

What You Must Produce (Deliverables)

Step-by-Step Build

  1. Choose a safe target:
    • Coloured object (e.g., bright red square)
    • QR code / fiducial marker
    • Simple shape (circle/triangle) against controlled background
  2. Write the Target Definition Document:
    • What qualifies
    • What doesn’t qualify
    • Known confusing cases (e.g., similar colours)
  3. Implement detection (example approaches):
    • Colour thresholding + contour detection
    • QR detection library
    • Template matching (careful with lighting)
  4. Log every detection:
    • timestamp, detected(true/false), confidence/score, reason, image filename
  5. Build a small evaluation set (at least 30 trials):
    • 15 with target present
    • 15 without target (hard negatives)
  6. Calculate performance:
    • False positives, false negatives
    • Precision/recall (optional but encouraged)
  7. Choose a threshold and justify it based on your results and mission risk (what’s worse: false alarm or miss?).

Data Format / Output

Analysis Ideas

Success Criteria

Evidence Checklist

Safety & Privacy

Common Failure Modes

Stretch Goals

Scaffolding Example (optional)

You are allowed to reuse structures and formats from other teams — but not their decisions.

Structure: “Full payload data pack”

  1. Readme (how to run + what files mean)
  2. Raw data (CSV)
  3. Processed summary (text + 3 bullet insights)
  4. Evidence (photos/screenshots)

Example insight prompts

  • What changed over time? What correlated with environment?